The dynamics of today’s architecture reflects the drastic social changes but it expresses as well the dominant flow of the cultural architecture form. The speed and development brought various new technologies and materials which expand into archite... The dynamics of today’s architecture reflects the drastic social changes but it expresses as well the dominant flow of the cultural architecture form. The speed and development brought various new technologies and materials which expand into architectural appearance and form, a relationship of internal-external boundaries, as well as architectural space. With such expanded range, the society develops into a multidimensional form, with diverse patterns in method of expression. Alongside, the coordination between humans and external factors from “places” gained more and more attention. The size and scale form new architectural patterns, which are differentiated from the standards. As such, from the past when architectural places were provided, establishing the internal-external relationship has been necessary, which has gradually developed as time and range of action changed. The present is better than the past, and the future is obviously better than the present in terms of technology and material evolution. From the constructions we witness today, the limits have already been far surpassed. If we think about the basics—human, nature, and environment—humans are part of nature, and they coexist. On the one hand, humans protect the nature, which makes the humans and environment indispensable for each other. But too the objects built artificially and the environment are also included in the basic relationships as long as humans exist. Such perspective, way how today’s architecture views space, and thoughts on how to set the internal-external boundaries have started in the history, and is still on going. They are now becoming important source to grasp the architecture space. This enables us to read the dynamics of architectural space from the internal-external relationship, after reflecting the societal changes. Looking at the inter-external relationship, as well as its intersection with the inner-space is therefore, a meaningful effort. From such background, the purpose of the is as follows: This tries to examine the correlations of expression characteristics and expression elements formed at inner space, according to the influx of external factors from the internal-external boundary and the object that affects the facilities of the space, as well as the relational thoughts of internal and external architectural space, and also how they are coordinating and directing the influx of external elements. With case analysis, we tend to look at the cause of such phenomena and corroborate its importance, and extract our conclusions. Also, the study is meaningful in that it grasps the usage of the space in modern architectural flow and cultural facilities and look at the future of cultural spaces from the range of their utilization. The results and implications are as follows: Firstly, the external and internal relationship is largely classified into proactive part and passive part, which influence the characteristics of the space to be static or dynamic. Such classification becomes critical evidence in deciding the usage and arrangement, and followed materials selection, as well as their physical sustainability. That is decided upon the influence that internal and external proactivity has to the object. The followed expression characteristics and expression elements neutralize such influence with the physical contracture gained from practical transparency from materials or phenomenological transparency, which resulted in spatial coordination. Also, for internal and external boundary, the proactive relation that is formed from material transparency gives out formal/optical expansion. However, at the same time, in terms of direction, it located the area in ancient Korea (North), in order to weaken the dependency to the external elements. On the other hand, for active and dynamic living, the relationship with the facilities remained human-centered, which brought internal-external proactivity in their relations, by locating in the South. Such idea was deduced from dining space of the Major space and Service space in terms of cultural facilities. Secondly, in cultural facilities—libraries, art galleries—were in mutual support with utilizing the space. It was just that the weight of usage in facilities differed by their classifications—major, main, serve, service. It is not to be comprehended simple mindedly to only deliver the usage and the contents of the facilities, having Major as the center. But share and communicate, to coordinate the facilities and the space into a flexible form. This enables the humans to break the mental, psychological alienation and seclusion, which let living to be cultural, so that with continuously improving steps of the characteristics that cultural facilities, we can predict the spatial flow of the cultural facilities. It can be manifested from the examples of Modern Wing Museum과 San Francisco Museum, Aliyev Center, and Denver Art Museum, that dramatized the characteristics of the Major spaces into experiential and formative display concepts. Third, from the relationships of expression characteristics and expression elements that we found out from the results of case analysis, the foundation of a space was the phenomenal transparency’s overlapping elements (among expression characteristics’ structural form and spatial transparency). The similarities were able to be bound into form, and among them, expression element’s void space had similar form with expression characteristics. From the expression elements derived by such expression characteristics, the transferred space is a physical aspect that connects with the space, which is formed by the elements that make up the spatial form. Duration is a visualization of materials’ physical properties, and formless characteristics based on their physical foundations. The time’s continuity, memorability, and progression could be recognized by visualizing the memorability that the duration implies. Also, it has been analyzed that even though the level is relative and small in range, when time progression forms by the communicative void space at internal-external boundary along with the material transparency, the more sealed the space was, the more time progression had its influence on inner space. The expansion, through formality—structural form, void space, figurative transparency, which is transparency of the space, practical transparency, which is the aspect of materials—enabled to perceive the depth of the space both visually and spatially, formally, visually, and experientially. The current study clarified how the spaces from cultural facilities lead the cultural flow in the modernity of such cultural facilities. The implications were that we could also predict the directionality of such flow. Considering expression elements and expression characteristics from the relationship between the object and inter-outer space, which are conducive to panning future architectural space. Such research are expected to be extended to other facilities, as well.
|
