中韩条件复句对比探讨一以表现条件关系的连接要素为中心[韩语论文]

资料分类免费韩语论文 责任编辑:金一助教更新时间:2017-05-05
提示:本资料为网络收集免费论文,存在不完整性。建议下载本站其它完整的收费论文。使用可通过查重系统的论文,才是您毕业的保障。
主句表达成果,从句解释前提的复句叫做前提复句。要研究前提复句,起首要考核的就是衔接主从句构成前提关系的衔接要素。本论文旨在经由过程对汉语和韩语前提复句的比较研究,剖析汉语前提连词和韩语前提衔接表示的意义及用法、统辞论特点,韩语论文范文,以说明二者的差异点。本文的第二章到第五章将前提复句分为充足前提、需要前提、无前提和妥协前提四年夜类,详细比较剖析了汉语前提连词和韩语前提衔接表示的特点。个中充足前提关系衔接要素包含“假如、只需”和“(?)”,需要前提关系衔接要素包含“只要”和“(?)”,无前提关系衔接要素包含“不论”和“(?)”,妥协前提关系衔接要素包含“即便、固然”和“(?)”等。在研究办法方面,本文重要经由过程例句比较对中韩前提衔接表示停止了剖析。文中起首考核了汉韩两种说话中具有雷同本能机能的前提衔接表示的意义及用法,从意义层面论述了二者的差异点,然后考核了二者统辞论方面的特点。统辞论特点重要又分为在文章中的地位,主语制约,与副词、助词、语尾衔接的特点,句型制约,与时制衔接的特点,与否认表达衔接的特点等六个方面。最初,文章的第六段对后面所述内容停止了归结总结,韩语论文范文,得出结论。

Abstract:

The main expression results, clauses explain the premise sentence called premise sentence. To discuss the premise of sentence, first assessment is the convergence of the main clause elements form cohesion relations premise. The purpose of this is through the process of comparative study of Chinese and Korean sentences in Chinese on premise, the premise of conjunctions and Korean convergence of meaning and usage, the words said on the characteristics, in order to illustrate the similarities and differences between the two. In the second chapter to the fifth chapter will be divided into sufficient premise, sentence premise premise, no need to compromise the premise and premise of four categories, with the analysis of the characteristics of Chinese and Korean conjunctions premise that convergence. What is the essential element of the relationship between the elements of the premise, "if only" and "(?)" , the need to include the premise of the convergence of the elements of the "as long as" and "(?)" , no prerequisite for the convergence of the elements contained in the "no matter" and "(?)" , compromise premise relations include "even though," and "(?)" Etc.. In the research method, this compares the convergence of the premise of the Chinese and South Korea, said the analysis. In this , the meaning and usage of the same function of the two kinds of speaking in the Han Dynasty are examined, and the similarities and differences of the two are discussed. Then, the characteristics of the two aspects are examined. The rhetoric features are divided into an important position in the article, the subject restriction, and adverbs, auxiliary words, final convergence characteristics, patterns of constraints, and system cohesion, and deny the six aspects of the characteristics of the expression of cohesion. At the beginning, the sixth paragraph of the article has been summarized and concluded that the contents of the article are summarized.

目录:

摘要 5 韩文摘要 6-7 目录 7-9 正文 9-60 参考文献 60-63 附录 63-64 个人简历 64 发表的学术论文 64

免费论文题目: