| 韩语副词中‘(？)’型接续副词的误用比拟显著，究其缘由是由于这一部门接续副词中存在几组异常经常使用然则极端轻易混杂的近义词。对韩语中近义词的准确差别运用一直是韩语进修者的一年夜困难。与笼统及短时间内难以习得的语感比拟，韩语论文题目，韩语进修者更偏向于寻觅可以从字面长进行鉴别的详细办法。所以本论文选择了‘(？)’型接续副词中涌现频率较高的表对峙关系的‘(？)’和表因果关系的‘(？)’为研究对象。起首对后人的研究停止分类概述，对‘(？)’型接续副词从界说、组成、功效、分类方面停止整体剖析，将研究的重点放在两组近义词的差别研究上，即从统辞(语法)论、语义学、语用学三个方面停止剖析。统辞(语法)论重要研究三者在前后句主语分歧方面有没有限制、前句谓词的性质有没有限制、后句句型有没有限制。在语义学剖析中为精确控制前后句所表示的意义关系采取了‘颠倒法’。语用学研究中以语法研究及语义研究为基本剖析统一种别内的三者能否可以交换，并之前面研究结论说明成果的涌现。研究发明：1。表‘对比’的‘对峙’时，‘(？)’在前后句主语能否分歧、前句谓词的性质方面均无穷制，但后句句型方面‘(？)’在后句为疑问句时存在限制，‘(？)’在后句为敕令句及祈使句时存在限制。表‘妥协’的‘对峙’时三者在三个方面均无穷制。前后句可颠倒的有两种情形：带有‘妥协’意味的非对等的‘对峙’，带有同时性的对等的‘对峙’，在这两种情形下‘(？)’‘(？)’，‘(？)’均实用，且三者可以交换。前后句为带有时光前后次序的非对等‘对峙’关系时弗成颠倒，此时只要‘(？)’，‘(？)’实用，且二者可以交换。2。‘(？)’三者在前后句主语能否分歧、前句谓词的性质方面均无穷制，然则当后句为敕令句或祈使句时不克不及运用‘(？)’。当人们广泛会依据前句得出后句的结论，这类因果关系为知识而不须要搀杂小我断定时，普通运用‘(？)’。当对因果关系的剖断参加小我客观断定身分时实用‘(？)’，且重要实用于白话。‘(？)’重要实用于逻辑性较强的口语中。当陈说句、疑问句中前后句为统一主语且为带有时光延续性状态或行动时只实用‘(？)’。后句为敕令句或祈使句时实用‘(？)’、‘(？)’，且两者可以交换，其它情形下三者都可运用，且可以交换，韩语论文网站，然则意义略有异同。 Abstract: Korean adverb "(? 'type connecting adverb misuse compare significantly. The reason is the because of this sector continue adverbs in the presence of several groups of abnormal often use however extremely easy promiscuous synonyms. Application of the accurate difference in Korean synonyms is always a big difficulty in Korean learners. Compared with the general and short time is difficult to acquire the sense of language, Korean learners tend to seek from the detailed measures to identify the long literal. So this thesis chooses the "(? Table type) "confrontation relation between emergence of high frequency adverbs" (? ) 'and causality ("? ) as the research object. Research on the descendants of the first classification, the "(? 'type connecting adverb from the definition, composition, function and classification of overall analysis, the research focus on two groups of synonym differences in research, namely from the speech grammar of the system theory, semantics, pragmatics studies three aspects to carry on the analysis. Syntax (grammar) on the three in the important research subject differences before and after the sentence there is no limit, the nature of the sentence before the predicate has no limits, there is no limit after sentence patterns. In the semantics analysis for precise control and sentence, the meaning of "reverse method" of the relationship. In order to study grammar and semantic analysis as the basic research in the three kind of unity can exchange in pragmatic research, and the research results of the front conclusion to emerge. Study found that: 1. Table "contrast" confrontation "," (? "In the sentence) before and after the subject whether differences, the nature of the previous sentence predicates are unlimited, but after the sentence pattern" (? There are limitations to interrogative) "in the sentence," (? ) 'in the post sentence as sentences and imperative sentences when decree limits. Table 'compromise' of the 'confrontation' three in three aspects: unlimited. Before and after the sentence can be reversed in two situations: a "compromise" means non reciprocity ", at the same time of confrontation" with "confrontation", equal in the two cases' (? "()? ) "," (? ) 'are practical, and the three can exchange. Before and after the sentence with time sequence of non equivalence "confrontation" relationship is not reversed, as long as the "(? ) "," (? Two) "practical, and can exchange. 2. "(? 'three in before and after the sentence subject whether differences, the sentence before predicate properties are unlimited, but when after the sentence to invoke sentence and imperative sentence cannot be used "? "). When people are widely on the basis of the previous sentence that sentence conclusion, this kind of causal relationship for knowledge and don't need doping ego off timing of a common application '. "). When the causal relationship between the section in ego identity ("practical objective judgment? ) ', and important utility in the vernacular. "(? ) 'important colloquial strong logic in. When a question, Chen and sentence as subject and unified with time continuity state or action "(only useful? "). After the sentence as a sentence or a decree of the imperative sentence when practical "(? ) "and" (? ) ', and both can be exchanged, the other three cases can be used, and can be exchanged, but the meaning is slightly different. 目录: |
