| 韩国语语尾“(?)”平日被界说定名为“曩昔时制语尾”,同时又可以表现多种“体”的意义。这与汉语时体表达领域迥然分歧,是以给母语为汉语的韩语进修者带来了必定的进修艰苦,同时同样成为了中韩互译的一个辣手成绩。是以,为了便于韩语进修者加倍清楚清楚明了地进修运用“(?)”,削减中韩互译中涌现的成绩,本文撇开以往直接将“(?)”界说为“曩昔时制语尾”而睁开比较研究的传统思绪,而是起首从认知说话学的实际层面临“(?)”运用进程中所表达的各类意义的发生理据和互相问的联系关系性停止认知剖析,然后再在此基本上对“(?)”在汉语中的对应关系停止研究,并经由过程所说明的几种对应关系对前文所阐述的对于“(?)”的认知剖析结论和韩汉对于时光认知措施的差别等成绩停止不和论证。本文共分为以下几章：本文第一章引见了研究目标、研究办法和步调和对于该范畴的研究结果。第二章对韩国语语尾“(?)”停止了认知剖析。固然国际外学术界对于韩国语语尾“(?)”的本体论研究和比较研究结果丰富,但对于“(?)”的领域划分及其意义表述上却至今未有一个同一而完全的阐述。是以,本章经由过程汇集剖析各类语法作品,对韩国语语尾“(?)”的意义停止梳理,然后运用认知说话学原型实际论述了“(?)”的原型意义和其他意义。在平日情形下“(?)”被看做具有表达“将来完了”的特别意义,但是本章运用时光-空间实际和隐喻实际对其存在的公道性做出扼要剖析,终究对“(?)”的意义及其联系关系性停止分类总结。第三章在前一章的基本上,对韩国文学著作(?)中的例句停止统计,论证了韩国语语尾“”(?)与汉语“了、着、过”等助词的对应关系的不典范性,同时也说明了韩国语语尾“(?)”在汉语中的其他重要对应关系,最初从认知说话学和传统语法形状论角度对韩中各类对应关系停止了阐释。最初一章为结论,综合全文,提炼不雅点,对上述研究结果停止了综合阐析,并指出文中的缺乏的地方及往后的尽力偏向。 Abstract: Korean ending "(?)" was named "the past is defined for the ending", at the same time can be expressed in a variety of "body" meaning. This field with very different expression in Chinese, is to give the Chinese Korean learners bring a certain study hard, but also become a difficult achievement of Chinese and Korean. So, in order to facilitate the Korean learners more clear clear learning application "(?)", cuts the emergence of Chinese and Korean, for the previous direct "(?)" is defined as "the past tense ending" and opened a comparative study of traditional thoughts, but the actual song from cognitive linguistics layer face "(?)" expressed by the application process in all kinds of sense of motivation and ask each link between cognitive analysis, and then this basically on the "(?)" correspondence in Chinese study, and through several relationship shows the process of the preceding on the "(?)" cognitive analysis conclusion and Han Han about the time difference method of cognitive issues with demonstration. This article is divided into the following chapters: the first chapter introduces the research objectives, research methods and measures and the results of the study on the category of the. The second chapter of the Korean ending "(?)" to stop the cognitive analysis. Although the international academic circles about the Korean ending "(?)" ontology research and comparative research results of rich, but about the "(?)" the field division and meaning but has not been a fully elaborated. In this chapter, through the analysis of various types of collection of Korean grammar works, ending "(?)" the meaning of carding, and application of cognitive linguistics prototype discussed "(?)" the prototype meaning and other meanings. In normal times, "(?)" is considered to have a special meaning to express "the future." but this chapter is to make a brief analysis of the rationality of the existence of time space reality and metaphor. The third chapter in the previous chapter basically, the Korean literary works "(?)" in the stop statistics, demonstrates the Korean "ending" (?) no canonical correspondence with Chinese ", and" auxiliary, but also shows the Korean ending "(?)" other important correspondence in Chinese, originally from cognitive linguistics and traditional grammar shape on the aspect of Korean all correspondence ofinterpretation. The first chapter is the conclusion of the article, refined indecent point, on the above research results for a comprehensive analysis, and pointed out that the lack of the place and back the hard bias. 目录: |
