| 韩国语“(?)”类共动句和汉语要求句作为外交语体,在人们的平常生涯中运用得异常频仍。在平常的外交运动中,因为攀谈两边身份、位置和措辞人的外交目标的分歧,也会采用完整分歧的表达措施。本文把韩国语“(?)”类共动句和汉语要求句作为研究对象,重要研究了二者之间的雷同点和分歧点。详细归纳综合以下：第一章绪论部门重要论述了本论文的研究目标、办法和以后的研究状态。第二章重要对韩国语“(?)”类共动句和汉语要求句从语义论方面停止了比较剖析。起首从二者的界说和规模动身,明白了这两种体裁与其他体裁在情势上的显著差别。然后对两者从语义方面停止了分类,剖析出二者独有的特色和特点。第三章重要从句法方面临韩国语“(?)”类共动句和汉语要求句停止了比较。起首对二者的主语、谓语、呼语的特色停止了具体的论述,然后将其停止比较,找出二者的雷同点和分歧点。然后论述韩国语“(?)”类共动句终结语尾和汉语要求句语气词的特色并停止了比较,找出了二者的对应关系。第四章对韩国语否认“(?)”类共动句和汉语否认要求句停止了比较。起首对韩国语否认“(?)”类共动句的类型和汉语否认要求句的特色停止了论述,然后将韩国语否认“(?)”类共动句与汉语否认要求句停止了比较,找出了二者的雷同点和分歧点。第五章是结论部门,对本文停止了总结。本篇论文在阐述韩国语“(?)”类共动句和汉语要求句各自的特色以后,重要从语义、句法等方面临两者停止了剖析比较,愿望对进修韩国语的中国粹生和韩语教授教养供给一点赞助。 Abstract: Korean "(?)" a total of sentences and Chinese sentences as foreign language requirements, in people's daily life in the application of unusually frequent. In the usual diplomatic movement, because of differences on both sides of the identity, position and expression of diplomatic goals chitchat, use different methods of expression. Between the Korean "(?)" co moving sentences and Chinese sentence request as the research object, mainly studies the two identical points and bifurcation points. Detailed summary below: the first chapter of the introduction section is important to discuss the research objectives, methods and future research status. The second chapter of Korean "(?)" a total sentence and Chinese sentence requirements stopped comparative analysis from the aspects of semantic theory. First of all from the start of the two definition and scale, understand the difference in the form of the two genres and other genres. Then the two from the semantic aspects of the classification, analysis of the unique characteristics and characteristics of the two. The third chapter important syntactic side facing the Korean "(?)" a total sentence and Chinese sentence requirements compared to stop. Characteristics of the chapeau of subject, predicate, vocative stopped in detail, then stop comparing, find out the similarities and differences. And then discusses the Korean "(?)" co moving sentence ending words and Chinese required tone word features and to stop the comparison to find the corresponding relationship between the two. The fourth chapter of the Korean denied the "(?)" a total of sentences and Chinese sentences compared to the demands that stop. Chapeau of Korean denied "(?)" total dynamic types and Chinese denies the claim sentences characteristic has carried on the elaboration, and Korean denied "(?)" total dynamic sentences and Chinese denies the claim sentences stopped compared to identify both the similarities and differences. The fifth chapter is the conclusion, which summarizes the conclusion of this paper. This paper describes the Korean "(?)" total dynamic sentences and Chinese sentences in their own characteristics after the important from the semantic and syntactic both faces to carry on the analysis comparison, desire to learn Korean Chinese students and Korean teaching supply a sponsorship. 目录: 摘要 7-8 Abstract 8-9 正文 12-68 参考文献 68-71 致谢 71 |
