| 偏好可以看作是人类行动的前因变量，对行动的偏向性起到了决议性感化。若何转变人们对于某事物的偏好进而激发出响应的行动曾经成为社会应用和心思学研究的热门。经常使用的转变偏好的手腕之一是评价性前提反射(Evaluative Conditioning，简称EC)。EC是指经由过程将一个中性的安慰(前提安慰，Conditioned Stimulus，韩语论文范文，简称CS)统一个曾经无情感偏好的安慰(非前提安慰，Unconditioned Stimulus，简称US)配对，来转变对中性安慰偏好的心思景象和技巧。对于EC作用偏好的研究曾经有许多，然则年夜多半采取的是阈上安慰，较少采取阈下安慰。直接比较阈上和阈下EC效应量年夜小的研究更少。对于EC的作用可否被认识所改正的研究也不多，更少有研究存眷阈下EC效应可否被认识改正，简直没有研究对阈上和阂下EC效应的改正停止比拟研究。所以针对这类状态本文对EC效应提出三个成绩停止研究：第一，阈上和阈下EC效应能否真实存在？第二，阈上和阈下EC效应哪一种效应量更强？第三，认识改正可否作用EC效应？改正效应在阈上和阈下EC效应上的表示出的性质和量有甚么差别？研究一，韩语毕业论文，采取中性的韩语字符作为CS，汉语情感词作为US。经由过程CS一US配对出现给被试。采取7点量表评价被试的偏好变更。成果发明明显的EC效应。研究二，分离采取阈上CS一阈下US、阈下CS一阈上US和阈上CS一阈下CS三种试验处置。成果发明第一种试验处置获得明显阈下EC效应，第二种没有发明EC效应，第三种没有发明虚伪EC效应。经由过程比较研究二和研究一中的EC效应量，发明阈上EC效应强于阈下EC效应。研究三，经由过程拔出改正指点语比较EC效应的改正效应在阈上和阈下程度上的差别。成果发明EC效应可以被认识改正，并且阈下水平的改正效应强于阈下程度的改正效应，乃至产生了过犹不及景象。 Abstract: Preferences can be regarded as the antecedent variables of human action, action bias plays a decisive role. How to change people's preferences in order to stimulate the response of the action has become a hot social and psychological research. One of the frequently used changes in the preference of the wrist is the evaluation of the Evaluative EC (Conditioning). EC refers to through the process will be a neutral comfort (comfort premise, using the unbiased stimulus (CS) unified have no emotional preferences of comfort (comfort condition, Unconditioned stimulus, referred to as the US) paired to shift to neutral comfort preference Mind Vision and skill. EC on the impact of preference on the study has a lot, but most likely to take the comfort of the threshold, less to take comfort. Direct comparison between the threshold and the threshold of the EC effect of the small study less. Effects on EC could be recognized correction research is not much, fewer researches concern subliminal EC effect could be recognized to correct, and there is almost no research on threshold and threshold EC effect of correct conduct comparative studies. So for this kind of status in this paper, the EC effect put forward three results to stop the discussion: first, the threshold and the threshold EC effect can be real existence? Second, the threshold and the threshold of EC effect which effect is stronger? Third, the understanding of the correction can affect the EC effect? What is the difference between the nature and quantity of the correction effect on the EC effect of the threshold and the threshold? Study one, take neutral Korean characters as CS, Chinese emotion words as US. Through the process CS a US pairing appears to be tried. The 7 point scale was adopted to evaluate the preference changes. The results of the invention obvious EC effect. Study two, separation to take the threshold of CS a threshold US, threshold CS a threshold of US and the threshold of CS a threshold of CS three kinds of test disposal. Results of the invention of the first experimental treatment to obtain a clear threshold EC effect, the second did not invent the EC effect, the third did not invent the false EC effect. Through the process of comparative study of the two and the study of the EC effect, the invention of the threshold EC effect is stronger than the threshold EC effect. Discussion three, through the process of correcting the effect of the correction effect of the correction effect in the threshold and the threshold of the difference between the EC effect. Inventions EC effect can be realized correction and threshold level of correction effect strongly on the threshold degree of correction effect and the overkill scene. 目录: 摘要 6-7 Abstract 7 目录 8-10 第一部分 探讨背景 10-43 1.1 偏好及相关探讨 10-14 1.1.1 先天偏好 10-12 1.1.2 习得性偏好与评价性条件反射 12-13 1.1.3 评价性条件反射同经典条件反射 13-14 1.2 阈下知觉和相关探讨 14-16 1.2.1 阈上和阈下知觉的定义 14 1.2.2 阈下知觉和阈下说服 14-15 1.2.3 阂下知觉的探讨和运用 15-16 1.3 评价性条件反射 16-39 1.3.1 探讨采用的刺激类型 16-21 1.3.2 程序参数 21-23 1.3.3 评价性条件反射的功能特点 23-34 1.3.4 评价性条件反射底层心理机制的理论模型 34-39 1.4 本探讨的目的和探讨假设 39-43 1.4.1 运用目的 39 1.4.2 理论目的 39-42 1.4.3 探讨假设 42-43 第二部分 实证探讨 43-86 2.1 探讨一(实验一) 43-57 2.1.1 探讨目的与设想 43-47 2.1.2 探讨措施 47-54 2.1.3 结果和讨论 54-57 2.2 探讨二(实验二、实验三、实验四) 57-74 2.2.1 探讨目的与设想 57-58 2.2.2 实验二 58-65 2.2.3 实验三 65-70 2.2.4 实验四 70-73 2.2.5 探讨二的总结果和总讨论 73-74 2.3 探讨三(实验五、实验六) 74-86 2.3.1 探讨目的和设想 74 2.3.2 实验五 74-79 2.3.3 实验六 79-84 2.3.4 探讨三的总讨论 84-86 第三部分 本探讨的总讨论 86-92 3.1 总讨论部分 86-89 3.1.1 EC效应是否真实存在? 86 3.1.2 偶联意识和EC效应之间的关系 86-87 3.1.3 边际条件和其对构建EC理论模型的借鉴意义 87-88 3.1.4 探讨结果对阂下探讨视角的借鉴意义 88-89 3.2 结论 89 3.3 探讨意义 89-90 3.3.1 理论贡献 89 3.3.2 现实运用意义 89-90 3.4 探讨的局限性和展望 90-92 3.4.1 本探讨的局限性 90-91 3.4.2 本探讨的展望 91-92 参考文献 92-97 附录 97-99 致谢 99 |
