| 跟着世界经济一体化的赓续成长,多边商业会谈停顿迟缓,世界列国开端将商业扩大的重点从多边自在商业转向了树立自在商业区。中国虽已跃居世界第一商业年夜国,却在FTA成长上远远落伍于商业份额较小的邻国——韩国。在如许的配景下,周全比较剖析中韩两国的FTA计谋具有较年夜的实际意义。本文基于组织计谋的视角,采取了SWOT矩阵剖析计谋选择和基于均衡计分法的分歧维度评价计谋后果,经由过程比较研究中韩两国在计谋制订、计谋选择和计谋实行成绩上的差别,试图找出中国的FTA计谋成绩,并提出可行性对策。本文经由过程比较剖析得出以下结论：起首,在计谋制订上,两国在计谋制订的进程中,设定的计谋目的着重点分歧,中国着重非经济身分,韩国着重经济身分。其次,在计谋实行中,两国的FTA会谈对象选择、地区选择、FTA内容和推动措施都有所差别。韩国选择年夜型经济体和新兴经济体,在各年夜洲均衡推动,多管齐下,并在协定内容上更周全。中国选择成长中经济体,选择按部就班处所式推动,在协定内容上稍显薄弱。最初在计谋评价中,中国与韩国比拟,进出口商业额增加更快但商业关系绝对较不亲密；中国公司对于FTA的运用率水平远远弱于韩国；中国的FTA计谋政策较少,表述较为笼统,并且平易近间介入FTA计谋机遇缺少。本文的立异的地方在于研究角度的立异和研究办法的立异。本文基于组织计谋的角度对FTA计谋提出了体系的剖析框架,即包括计谋制订、计谋实行和计谋评价三方面内容。同时,本文在对FTA计谋评价研究中参考了均衡计分法的分歧维度评价办法,对FTA计谋从综合效益维度、好处相干者维度和政策操作维度三方面评价。 Abstract: Along with the ceaseless development of world economic integration, multilateral trade negotiations stalled slow, all countries in the world start will be to expand our business focus from the multilateral free trade to establish a free trade area. Chinese has been ranked first in the world big trading nation, but in the FTA growth far behind the business share of smaller neighbors -- South korea. In this context, a comprehensive and practical significance analysis of China and South Korea have bigger FTA strategy. The based on the perspective of organizational strategy, take the SWOT matrix analysis of strategic choice and based on the different dimensions of evaluation strategy consequences of Balanced Scorecard, through comparative research between China and South Korea in the strategy formulation, strategy choice and strategy implementation performance differences, trying to find out China's FTA strategy performance, and puts forward some feasible countermeasures. In this paper, through comparative analysis we can draw the following conclusions: first and foremost, to formulate the strategy, between the two countries in the strategy formulation process, set strategic objectives with key differences. The Chinese emphasis on non economic factors, South Korea on economic status. Secondly, in the strategy implementation, the two FTA talks object selection, area selection, FTA content and promote methods are different. South Korea choose large and emerging economies in all continents, promote balanced, multi pronged, and more comprehensive in content agreement. Chinese select growth economies, choose to follow the prescribed order promote agreement in place, slightly weak. Initially in the strategic evaluation, China and South Korea compared, import and export trade volume has increased faster but commercial relationship between absolute less intimate; application of Chinese enterprises on the FTA rate level is far weaker than the Korean; China's FTA strategy policy less, expression of more general and plain nearly intervention FTA strategy opportunity lack. In this paper, the innovation lies in the innovation of research perspective and research methods innovation. This paper based on the perspective of organizational strategy is proposed to analyze the framework of FTA strategy, including strategy formulation, strategy implementation and strategic evaluation of three aspects. At the same time, based on the FTA strategy evaluation study reference dimension evaluation method of Balanced Scorecard differences, relative dimension and operation dimension three policy evaluation of FTA strategy from the comprehensive benefits, benefits dimension. 目录: 摘要 4-5 Abstract 5 目录 6-8 第一章 绪论 8-15 1.1 探讨背景与选题意义 8-9 1.1.1 探讨背景 8 1.1.2 探讨意义 8-9 1.2 国内外探讨综述 9-13 1.2.1 组织战略理论探讨综述 9-10 1.2.2 战略的措施论探讨综述 10-11 1.2.3 FTA战略探讨综述 11-13 1.3 创新之处与不足 13-14 1.4 基本思路 14-15 第二章 FTA全球发展近况与动因略论 15-24 2.1 战略的概念 15-16 2.2 FTA概念 16-17 2.3 FTA相关理论 17-18 2.3.1 多米诺效应 17 2.3.2 轮轴-轮辐效应 17-18 2.4 全球FTA发展的近况 18-21 2.5 全球FTA发展的动因略论 21-24 第三章 中国FTA战略 24-38 3.1 中国FTA战略的制定 24-27 3.1.1 内外部环境略论 24-25 3.1.2 战略目标 25-26 3.1.3 战略略论和选择 26-27 3.2 中国FTA战略实施 27-31 3.2.1 战略推进方式 27-28 3.2.2 FTA建立的具体内容 28-31 3.3 中国FTA战略评价 31-37 3.3.1 综合效益维度 32-34 3.3.2 利益相关者维度 34-35 3.3.3 政策操作维度 35-37 3.4 小结 37-38 第四章 韩国FTA战略选择 38-50 4.1 韩国FTA战略制定 38-40 4.1.1 内外部环境略论 38-39 4.1.2 战略目标 39 4.1.3 战略略论和选择 39-40 4.2 韩国FTA战略实施 40-44 4.2.1 战略推进方式 40-41 4.2.2 FTA建立的具体内容 41-44 4.3 韩国FTA战略评价 44-48 4.3.1 综合效益维度 44-46 4.3.2 利益相关者维度 46-47 4.3.3 政策操作维度 47-48 4.4 小结 48-50 第五章 中韩FTA战略对比略论 50-55 5.1 战略目的：非经济因素VS经济因素 50 5.2 中韩两国FTA战略实施对比 50-52 5.2.1 推进方式：循序渐进VS多管齐下 50-51 5.2.2 中韩两国FTA建立的具体内容对比 51-52 5.3 中韩两国FTA战略评价对比 52-53 5.3.1 综合效益：密切程度低VS密切程度高 52 5.3.2 利益相关者：公司利用率低VS公司利用率高 52-53 5.3.3 政策操作：政策和民间参与少VS政策明确、民间参与多 53 5.4 小结 53-55 第六章 为改进我国战略的建议 55-57 参考文献 57-60 致谢 60 |
