| 由于船舶具有向世界各区域飞行的特点和挪动性的特点，所以有关海事的诉讼或仲裁等的胶葛包含许多国际性的身分。特殊是中国和韩国地舆上的接近性和世界化趋向，使得两国船舶入出港频仍，所以或年夜或小的海上变乱和有关海上运输的胶葛时有产生。国际胶葛争的情形与国际胶葛的情形雷同，经由过程两边当事人之间的协定或息争来处理胶葛是最公道的，然则协商弗成能处理的，免费韩语论文，应该斟酌诉讼或仲裁的胶葛处理办法。可是由于船舶具有飞行的特点，债务人经由过程诉讼的办法不克不及随意马虎处理海事胶葛。对于提告状讼的，常常产生时光糟蹋的情形；对于收到肯定判决而债权人没有产业的，韩语论文题目，现实上履行对该船舶的判决也是弗成能的。是以债务人在提告状讼前应斟酌未来履行与否的能够性。为了未来履行的保全，一种处理办法是经由过程拘留收禁船舶请求债权人供给担保。为了到达研究的目标，采用了以下的研究办法第一，船舶拘留收禁范畴的研究规模包含平易近法、海商法(商法)、和平易近事诉讼法、国际诉讼法、国际私法等。所以本论文在研究有关船舶拘留收禁的成绩中，在中国以海事诉讼特殊法式法上的海事要求保全轨制中拘留收禁船舶的划定为中间，在韩国以平易近事履行法上的拘留收禁船舶的划定为中间，评论辩论清偿权人的权力行使和债权人的解救办法和引入了活用计划，剖析了司法划定的说明上的成绩，得出懂得决办法。第二，虽然船舶拘留收禁的范畴是海事债务人最重要的关怀事项之一，然则理论上的实例依然不多，是以将司法和实务上的成绩结合起来讲明。本论文能够还存在许多不完美的地方，但笔者愿望本论文可以或许被中韩两国的有关部分普遍参阅，使他们能更深刻地舆解两国的拘留收禁船舶轨制。 Abstract: Because the ship has the characteristics of flight to the world and the characteristics of the movement, so the relevant maritime litigation or arbitration, such as plastic Ge contains a number of international identity. Especially in China and South Korea geographically close and the world trend, makes their ship into port frequently, so or big or small maritime accident and relating to maritime transport glue Gregory has produced. Similar international glue Gregory dispute and the glue Gregory, via the process on both sides between the parties agreement or information to deal with glue Gregory is the most reasonable, however negotiations Eph into can handle the, should consider the litigation or arbitration glue Gregory approach. However, due to the characteristics of the ship's flight, the debtor's approach to the process of litigation can not be careless handling of marine rubber. About sue him, often resulting in a waste of time, on receipt of the affirmative judgement and creditors have no industry, the practical performance of the ship's decision also Eph into energy. Is to lodge a complaint before the debtor in the future should consider whether or not to perform. In order to perform the preservation of the future, one approach is to provide security to the creditor by the detention of the vessel. In order to reach the research goal, the following research methods first, ship detained ban of research in the field of scale contains plain near law, maritime law (Commercial Law), and the peace civil procedure law, international procedure law, private international law. So this thesis in research about ship detention charge ban achievements, in China in Maritime Litigation Special French law of maritime requirements rail preservation of detention cut delineation of the ship as intermediate, in South Korea to civilian to perform law distrain ships designated as intermediate and comment on liquidation of debate in the exercise of power and creditor's remedy and the introduction of the flexible plan, analysis of the legal provisions on the problems, come to know a solution. Second, although the ship detained ban category is one of the maritime obligor is the most important concern matters, however theory example is still not much is to explain by combination of justice and practical results. There are still many imperfect places, but I hope this thesis can be widely read by the relevant parts of the two countries, so that they can more deeply understand the two countries of the detention of the ship's rail system. 目录: 引言 9-10 第1章 海事请求保全的一般考察 10-18 1.1 海事诉讼特别程序法和民事执行法 10-14 1.1.1 意义 10-11 1.1.2 特征 11-14 1.2 海事请求保全的意义和特征 14-18 1.2.1 海事请求保全的意义 14-15 1.2.2 海事请求保全的特征 15-18 第2章 扣押船舶概念和特征之比较 18-26 2.1 扣押船舶的概念 18-24 2.1.1 海事诉讼法 18-19 2.1.2 民事执行法 19-21 2.1.3 英美的对物诉讼制度 21-22 2.1.4 Mareva Injunction制度 22-24 2.2 扣押船舶的特征 24-26 2.2.1 海事诉讼法 24 2.2.2 民事执行法 24-26 第3章 扣押船舶要件之比较 26-33 3.1 可申请扣船的海事请求 26-28 3.1.1 海事诉讼法 26-27 3.1.2 民事执行法 27-28 3.2 扣船的范围 28-31 3.2.1 海事诉讼法 28-29 3.2.2 民事执行法 29-31 3.3 管辖法院 31-33 3.3.1 海事诉讼法 31-32 3.3.2 民事执行法 32-33 第4章 扣押船舶程序之比较 33-46 4.1 申请书的提交 33-35 4.1.1 海事诉讼法 33-34 4.1.2 民事执行法 34-35 4.2 审查和裁定 35-38 4.2.1 海事诉讼法 35-37 4.2.2 民事执行法 37-38 4.3 裁定的执行 38-39 4.3.1 海事诉讼法 38-39 4.3.2 民事执行法 39 4.4 解除扣押 39-41 4.4.1 海事诉讼法 39-40 4.4.2 民事执行法 40-41 4.5 航行许可(活扣) 41-43 4.5.1 海事诉讼法 41-42 4.5.2 民事执行法 42-43 4.6 船舶国籍证书等的收取命令 43-46 第5章 扣押船舶效果之比较 46-54 5.1 强制拍卖船舶 46-50 5.1.1 海事诉讼法 46-49 5.1.2 民事执行法 49-50 5.2 关于错误扣船的赔偿责任 50-54 5.2.1 海事诉讼法 50-51 5.2.2 民事执行法 51-54 结论 54-56 参考文献 56-57 攻读学位期间公开发表论文 57-58 致谢 58-59 探讨生履历 59 |
