| 1982年结合国陆地法条约(United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea)在海域划界成绩上,分离对相邻或相向国度间的年夜陆架和专属经济区的划界成绩划定了指点性的规矩：“在国际法的基本上,经由过程协商获致公正的处理”。基于该条约的普遍性和周全性,其俨然已成为调理国际陆地次序的一部基本性司法,列国在处置海域划界争端时都必需予以遵照。中国和韩都城是结合国陆地法条约的缔约国,两国间的海域争端划界成绩须要按照条约之划定,经由过程协商获致公正处理。故此,中韩两国应以“在国际法的基本上,经由过程协商获致公正处理”为配合立场。但两国基于自国有益的视角保持分歧的划界办法和权衡身分的分歧的看待——中国主意“公正准绳／相干情形”,而韩国则保持“等间隔准绳／特别情形”。因保持分歧的主意,两国的划界会谈获得的停顿非常无限。为商量两国在专属经济区和年夜陆架规模内的划界窘境,本文经由过程三个方面停止阐述。第一章对陆地法条约中海域划界实际的演化停止了剖析阐释,并联合海域划界理论中涌现的案例引见了公正准绳和中央线准绳在理论中的运用,剖析以后国度间处理海域争真个通行做法；第二章侧重剖析了中韩两国所主意的划界准绳和存眷的作用海域划界的身分,包含立法情形、领海基线、岛屿、国度行动、汗青性权力、海岸线比例、天然资本和平安防卫、飞行好处等,指出了中韩争议海域划界所需考量的权衡身分；基于前两章的剖析,第三章联合中韩两国海域争真个现实情况和争议海域的特别情况,提出了弥合两国不合、处理两国间划界窘境和胶葛的建议。呼吁两边以西南亚战争的年夜局为动身点,停滞损害两国公民的行为,战争处理海域划界争端。 Abstract: In 1982 the united country land law treaty "(United Nations Convention on the law of the sea in the achievement of maritime delimitation, separation of adjacent or opposite countries of continental shelf and exclusive economic zone demarcation results delineate the guiding rules:" in international law, through process consultation attainment fair treatment ". Based on the universality and the comprehensive nature of the treaty, it has become a basic law to regulate the order of the international land. Chinese and Korean capital is the combination of the Contracting State in which the Nations Convention on the law of the land ", between waters demarcation disputes result need according to treaty delineated through negotiation process to achieve justice processing. Therefore, China and South Korea should be "in international law basically, through the process of negotiation to achieve justice" for the position. But the two countries from the perspective of the beneficial to maintain the different demarcation method and measure of the differences between the identity view -- China's idea of "the principle of impartiality / coherence" based on, while South Korea remained "interval criterion / special circumstances." Due to the idea of maintaining differences, the demarcation talks between the two countries to get a very indefinite pause. In order to discuss the demarcation dilemma between the two countries in the exclusive economic zone and continental shelf scale, this article through the three aspects of the process to stop. The first chapter on the evolution of the "land law treaty" sea demarcation for the analysis and interpretation of the actual case, introduces the theory and the emergence of joint maritime delimitation in the application of the principle of impartiality and the central line on the principles of theory, analysis of the current inter country competition is a common practice to deal with sea; the second chapter analyzes the principle of delimitation between China and South Korea the idea and concern of the influence of maritime delimitation identity, including the legislative situation, the baselines of the territorial sea and islands, national action, historical power, coastline proportion, natural resources and safe defense, flight benefits, points out the delimitation Korea disputed waters required consideration balance status; analysis based on the former two chapters, especially the third chapter, combined with China and South Korea Sea disputes the reality and the disputed waters, the bridge two clashes, deal with the delimitation of dilemma and gluegregory suggestions. Called on both sides of the South Asian war in the west of the eve of the war as a starting point, the behavior of the two countries to halt the damage, the war to deal with maritime delimitation disputes. 目录: 中文摘要 4-5 Abstract 5-6 引言 9-12 一、探讨的意义 10-11 二、探讨措施与论证思路 11-12 第一章 海洋法公约的划界理论与划界实践 12-23 一、海洋法公约的划界理论 12-15 (一) 海洋法公约的划界准则的形成 12-13 (二) 第74条和83条中公平解决的含义 13-14 (三) 衡量因素：特殊情况和相关情况 14-15 二、海域划界的实践 15-23 (一) 海域划界的国际法实践 16-20 (二) 仲裁的实践 20-21 (三) 公平标准实践上的衡量因素和划界措施 21-23 第二章 中韩海域划界上的衡量因素比较 23-38 一、中韩两国海域划界的近况 23-28 (一) 海域划界上的两国国内立法情况 24-26 (二) 海域划界谈判情况 26-28 二、中韩两国划界衡量因素的比较 28-38 (一) 大陆架的自然延伸 28-30 (二) 领海基线 30-33 (三) 岛屿 33-34 (四) 国家行为和禁止反言 34 (五) 历史性权利 34-35 (六) 安全、防卫和航行利益 35-36 (七) 蕴藏的天然资源 36 (八) 海岸线比例 36-38 第三章 公平划界的思考和建议 38-48 一、中韩海域争端的思考 38-43 (一) 中国在中韩海域争端上的主张 38-40 (二) 韩国在中韩海域争端上的主张 40-42 (三) 中韩主张的对比略论 42-43 二、中韩海域争端公平解决的建议 43-48 (一) 坚持不放大海域争端问题 44-45 (二) 搁置争议制定公平标准 45-48 结语 48-49 参考文献 49-52 后记 52 |
