| 与蓬勃国度的课程比拟研究是列国课程改造的主要基本研究任务，教科书的比拟研究是该部门的主要构成部门。因为受近代韩国汗青成长的作用，韩国适应国际课程改造趋向，同时联合本国的现实国情，在基本教导课程改造与理论上获得了优秀的成就。本文经由过程对中韩两国小学新版数学教科书停止比拟研究，找到两国小学数学教科书编写办法和各自的优势和缺乏，同时自创韩国教科书编写的胜利经历，为中国小学数学教科书编写供给编写建议。本文重要采取文献法、内容剖析法、比拟法和个案法，对中韩两国小学数学教科书的文本构造、各个范畴的内容及“数与代数”和“空间与图形”范畴内容难度、个案“分数”内容停止比拟，得出以下结论：两版教科书都强调与响应课程尺度分歧，文本根本构造类似，重视情境导入的感化，栏目及单位外部出现出较年夜差别，国定版将进修内容细化，各个运动成为主线，人教版由传统构造组成；栏目标性质类似，但功效上国定版重视其综合才能造就等感化。人教版严厉保持螺旋式课程编排，韩语论文网站，而国定版测验考试在直线式和螺旋式中寻觅均衡，然则都强调先生数学成绩处理、研讨才能的晋升。在难度上，人教版“整数”与“立体图形”部门较难，国定版“分数”、“小数”和“平面图形”部门较难。依据以上结论，。提出了以下建议：教科书在处置概念导入时，可以恰当延伸研讨的时光和细化研讨的进程，使先生在阅历必定研讨进程的基本长进一步深刻到下一个条理的进修运动，完成一个数学内容的熟悉进程，在此时代先生可以取得进修的自动才能和立异才能，在完成研讨运动后体验研讨结果的乐趣，以取得来自数学进修的自负心；教科书在进修内容互相渗入渗出、融会时，不要仅仅依附于“成绩处理”或许“理论与综合应用”中表现，韩语论文范文，可以在各范畴间互相渗入渗出，丰硕表现数学学科全体性的融会措施；教科书不要过于保持的螺旋上升式构造，可以下降数学内容简略反复涌现的次数，构成直不雅的内容间连接构造，防止糟蹋名贵的课程时光。 Abstract: Compared with the vigorous national curriculum research is the main basic research task of the reform of the curriculum, the textbook is the main part of the Department of research. Because of the influence of the development of modern Korean history, South Korea to adapt to the trend of international curriculum reform, at the same time, the reality of the United Nation's national conditions, in the basic education curriculum reform and theory has been excellent achievements. This article through the process of China and South Korea to compare the new version of the mathematics textbooks, to find the two primary school mathematics textbook compilation methods and their respective advantages and the lack of the Korean textbooks written in the successful experience, for the Chinese primary school mathematics textbook compilation provides suggestions. This paper adopts literature method, content analysis method, comparative analysis method and case study method, text structure, various areas of China and South Korea primary school mathematics textbook and the contents of "number and Algebra" and "space and graph" category content difficulty, case "score" content to carry on the comparison, the following conclusions: two edition textbooks are emphasized the course and response scale differences, text structure, valuing situation into action, and column unit external show is a big difference, the national edition will learn the content refinement, each movement as the main line, consisting of traditional structure Renjiao; column of similar nature, but the effect on national attention in order to create a version of its comprehensive effects. PEP severely keep spiral curriculum arrangement, and national version of the test in straight and spiral search a balance, but stressed that Mr. math processing, discuss to promotion. In difficulty, PEP Edition "integer" and three-dimensional graphics department is difficult to, the national version of "score", "decimal" and "graphic" sector is more difficult. According to the above conclusions,. Put forward the following suggestions: the textbook in the disposal of introducing the concept, to explore the appropriate extension of time and can refine the process, the basic experience of Mr. long in the process must be further to the next level of the education movement, a mathematical content familiar process, this time can be achieved automatically in order to study Mr. the result of the study and innovation ability, experience the fun in the discussion after exercise, in order to obtain self-esteem from mathematics education; textbooks in the study mutually infiltration and integration, not only depend on the "performance" or "theory and comprehensive application in performance, can penetrate into each other in each category between exudation, integration methods all of the performance fruitful mathematics textbooks; don't keep up the spiral type structure, can decrease anti mathematical content briefly After the emergence of the number of times, constitute the content of the direct connection between the structure, to prevent the waste of valuable lessons time. 目录: |
