| 引导作风会对员工组织许诺程度发生极端深入的作用，而文明也是作用引导作风和员工组织许诺的主要身分。本研究以中、韩两国分歧的文明配景为动身点，韩语论文网站，援用后人的引导作风和组织许诺量表，分离对中、韩两国的员工停止数据剖析，研究生意业务型引导作风、变更型引导作风与员工组织许诺之间的关系，以商量在分歧文明配景下哪一种引导作风对公司来讲更适合、更有用。本研究运用后人量表停止问卷查询拜访和数据搜集。起首，分离对中韩两国样本数据统计和剖析。在中国文明配景下，经由过程因子剖析将引导作风拟分解榜样垂行、智力激起、愿景鼓励、生意业务治理、本质性生意业务、心思生意业务六个维度，将组织许诺拟分解情绪许诺、连续许诺和标准许诺三个维度；相干剖析发明引导作风及其各个维度均与组织许诺及其各个维度呈明显正相干关系；回归剖析发明，智力激起、生意业务治理和本质性生意业务可以或许猜测组织许诺。在韩国文明配景下，经由过程因子剖析将引导作风以德服人、智力激起、权变嘉奖、心思生意业务四个维度；将组织许诺拟分解情绪许诺、连续许诺和标准许诺三个维度；相干剖析显示引导作风及其子维度与情绪许诺、标准许诺和组织许诺整体有着明显的相干关系；回归剖析发明，以德服人和智力激起对组织许诺有明显的正向猜测感化。其次，对两国文明配景下的引导作风和组织许诺停止比拟剖析。经由过程程度比拟发明，在引导作风和组织许诺程度上，除在连续许诺维度上，韩国略高于中国，在整体引导作风及其子维度，整体组织许诺、情绪许诺和标准许诺上，中都城要高于韩国；经由过程比拟引导作风和组织许诺的相干关系发明，引导作风与组织许诺存在明显的正相干关系，而且中国的引导作风与组织许诺的正相干关系系数均高于韩国；经由过程回归剖析比拟发明，中国文明下，变更型引导行动和生意业务型引导行动比起韩国文明下的引导行动更能猜测员工的整体组织许诺。最初，针对两国分歧文明特色，提出治理者引导作风造就和员工组织许诺晋升建议，愿望在中韩分歧文明中寻觅到更合适本国文明的引导作风，韩语论文网站，对中韩公司在治理任务中的引导作风选择供给必定的实际支撑和理论指点。 Abstract: Leading style will have an extremely profound impact on the organizational commitment of employees, and civilization is the main factor influencing the style of leadership and organizational commitment. The research to the ROK differences of cultural background as a starting point, avail himself of the descendants of the guide style, and organizational commitment scale, separation of both China and Korea employees data analysis, research business guiding style, the change of guiding the relationship between style and employee organizational commitment, to discuss under the different cultural background which a guide style of enterprises, more adaptable, more useful. The research and application of later generations questionnaire survey and data collection. First of all, the separation of the two countries, China and South Korea sample data statistics and analysis. Under the Chinese civilization with king, through the analysis of the process will guide the style to be decomposed vertical line, intelligence, vision to encourage, business management, business, thinking business six dimensions, the organization promises to be decomposed emotional commitment, continuous commitment and standard promises three dimensions; coherent analysis of the style and its various dimensions are significantly positive correlation with the organizational commitment and its various dimensions. In Korean culture background. Through factor analysis will guide style virtuous, arousing the intelligence, four dimensions of contingency awards, mind business; organizational commitment proposed decomposition of emotional commitment, continuous commitment and standard promised three dimensions; coherence analysis showed that guide style and its sub dimensions and emotional commitment, standard commitment and organizational commitment overall has a obvious correlation; regression analysis method, virtuous and intellectual provoked significant positive forecast effect on organizational commitment. Secondly, the two countries with the cultural background of the guide style and organizational commitment to stop the comparative analysis. Through the process of invention, in guiding style and organizational commitment, in addition to the continuous promise, Korea is slightly higher than China, in the overall guiding style and its sub dimensions, the overall organizational commitment, emotional commitment and standard promise, the capital should be higher than South Korea through the process of guiding style and organizational commitment to the relationship between the clear positive correlation, and China's leading style and organizational commitment are higher than Korea. Initially, for the two different cultural characteristics, proposed to guide the style of governance and staff organization promises to promote the proposal, the desire to find a more appropriate guidance style of civilization in China and South Korea, the Chinese and Korean enterprises in the management of Ren Wuzhong's choice of style of choice to provide practical support and theoretical guidance. 目录: |
