| 因为年夜陆架条约和结合国陆地法条约中划定的不肯定性及年夜陆架的主要位置,国际上对于年夜陆架划界成绩一贯存在着争议。从国际司法理论可以看出,在年夜陆架划界中,公正准绳处于重要位置,是停止年夜陆架划界时所应当遵守的根本准绳,而且逐步向详细化和标准化的偏向成长。天然延长准绳和等间隔/中央线准绳只是年夜陆架划界完成公正成果的保证,2001年卡塔尔——巴林案中肯定了“公正——相干情形”规矩,这类划界形式根本成为后来年夜陆架划界的固定形式。固然等间隔/中央线准绳以此在年夜陆架划界中被采取,但它只是一种保证划界成果公正的办法,不具有国际习气法位置。天然延长准绳在1969年北海年夜陆架案中被确立为对年夜陆架停止划界的根本准绳,具有国际习气法位置,固然尔后位置有所降低,但并没有从汗青中“衰退”,它奠基了年夜陆架的权力基本,还是对年夜陆架停止划界的主要准绳。对于中韩年夜陆架划界成绩,最好的成果是两国经由过程会谈商量杀青原谅,经由过程双边协约或多边协约肯定两国年夜陆架。政治门路行欠亨时,两国应增强地质勘察,汇集更多的数据,依照国际诉讼法式处理成绩。两国在年夜陆架划界时应保持以公正准绳为根本准绳,以天然延长准绳和等间隔/中央线准绳为帮助准绳,在公正准绳的指点下,综合斟酌各类相干情形,包管划界成果到达公正。 Abstract: Because of the uncertainty and the main position of the continental shelf in the Treaty of the continental shelf and the continental shelf in the land law treaty of the United Nations, there is a controversy about the international land demarcation results. From the international judicial theory can be seen, in the continental shelf delimitation, the justice principle is in an important position, it is to stop the delimitation of the continental shelf should comply with the basic criterion, and gradually to the detailed and standardized development. Natural extension of the line and other / the central line criterion is only the completion of the shelf delimitation of the results of the guarantee, in 2001 Qatar - Bahrain in the case of a certain "fair - coherent situation" rules, this kind of demarcation in the form of the continental shelf. While waiting for the space / central line to be taken in the continental shelf delimitation, it is just a way to ensure that the delimitation of the results of a fair, not with the international customary law position. Natural extension of the standard in the 1969 Beihai shelf case was established as a fundamental criterion for the delimitation of the continental shelf delimitation, with international practices, although the position has been reduced, but did not from the history of recession, it laid the foundation of the power of the shelf, or the main principle of the Continental shelf. China and South Korea on continental shelf delimitation scores, the best results is through the process of bilateral talks about fixing the pardon, through bilateral or multilateral agreements between the two countries must the continental shelf. Political connections will not pay, the two countries should strengthen the geological survey, collecting more data, in accordance with the French international litigation results. When the two countries in the continental shelf delimitation should be maintained with the principle of justice as the fundamental principle, natural extension of the standard and other central line as the principle, the principle of guidance, the comprehensive consideration of all kinds of relevant circumstances, ensure that the demarcation of the results to be fair. 目录: 摘要 2-3 Abstract 3 引言 6-9 第一章 大陆架划界争端概述 9-12 1.1 大陆架概念及外部界限 9-10 1.1.1 大陆架概念 9-10 1.1.2 大陆架外部界限 10 1.2 大陆架划界争端的由来和焦点 10-12 第二章 大陆架划界准则 12-16 2.1 自然延伸准则 12-13 2.1.1 自然延伸准则的概念 12 2.1.2 自然延伸准则的法学渊源 12-13 2.2 等距离/中间线准则 13-15 2.2.1 等距离/中问线准则的概念 13 2.2.2 等距离/中间线准则的法学渊源 13-15 2.3 公平准则 15-16 2.3.1 公平准则的法学渊源 15 2.3.2 国际上的认同度 15-16 第三章 国际法学实践与大陆架划界准则发展趋势 16-28 3.1 大陆架划界准则在划界案例中的体现 16-20 3.2 大陆架划界准则发展趋势 20-25 3.2.1 自然延伸准则与公平准则的关系 21-22 3.2.2 等距离/中间线准则与公平准则的关系 22 3.2.3 公平准则的规范化发展趋势 22-25 3.3 构建公平准则体系 25-28 第四章 对中韩大陆架划界的启示 28-36 4.1 中韩大陆架概况 28-29 4.1.1 中韩大陆架地理环境 28 4.1.2 中韩大陆架划界争端由来 28-29 4.2 中韩在大陆架划界问题上的争端 29-31 4.2.1 中韩在大陆架上的立法 29-30 4.2.2 中韩在大陆架划界上的主张 30 4.2.3 中韩在大陆架划界问题上的冲突事件 30-31 4.3 中韩大陆架划界争端的解决 31-36 4.3.1 解决海洋划界争端的措施 31-32 4.3.2 中韩大陆架划界争端的解决途径 32-36 结语 36-37 参考文献 37-39 攻读学位期间的探讨成果 39-40 致谢 40-41 |
