| 继2008年美国金融危机以后，世界经济再次禁受了欧洲金融危机的冲击。这是二十世纪三十年月年夜萧条以后，史无前例的全球性经济危机。从经济史角度来讲，韩语论文范文，此次囊括全球的经济危机，其实不是由一些孤立身分招致的，而是由各类各样的庞杂身分配合形成的。鉴于此，本文梳理了对于金融危机的相干假定和代表性实际，比拟了他们之间的接洽和异同。由此以为金融标准放宽带来的低利率历久化、监管机构义务感的缺少和监视机制的落伍等缘由配合招致了此次金融危机。本文重要比拟了次贷危机对中韩两国所发生的作用和两国相干的应对政策。起首，联合相干统计数据论述了次贷危机对韩国金融市场和实体经济的作用，并将此时代韩国当局的应对政谋划分为金融稳固政策、外汇稳固政策和扩大性的财务政策。然后论述了次贷危机对中国各个经济层面的作用，特殊是中国以出口为主导的经济增加形式，使对外商业在经济危机中遭遇繁重袭击。为此，中国当局出台了一系列的公司搀扶政策而且加年夜了减税的力度，使外贸公司年夜量开张的情形获得了减缓。虽然中韩两国在面临金融危机时都采用了抓紧银根和扩展财务收入等政策手腕，但由于两国的经济特质和所处的经济情况分歧，韩语毕业论文，在应对办法上又存在许多的差别。韩国由于外汇贮备缺乏采用了与美中日停止年夜范围失落期生意业务的办法来防备外汇风险；同时中国因价钱管控而受动力方面的冲击较小；并且中国的财务安慰办法实行的时光比拟韩国来讲更长。 Abstract: Following the 2008 USA after the financial crisis, the world economy again the European financial crisis. This is the thirty time in twentieth Century after the great depression, an unprecedented global economic crisis. From the perspective of economic history, the global economic crisis, in fact, is not caused by some isolated factors, but by a variety of complex factors with the formation of. In view of this, this paper summarizes the relevant assumptions and the representative of the financial crisis, and compares the differences between them. Which think financial standard relaxation caused by long-term low interest rates, regulatory responsibility and lack of monitoring mechanism behind the reason with the cause of the financial crisis. This paper compares the impact of the subprime crisis on China and South Korea and the relevant policies of the two countries. First, the combination of relevant statistical data on the impact of the subprime mortgage crisis on the financial markets and the real economy in South Korea, and the South Korean authorities of the times to deal with the financial stability policy, foreign exchange policy and financial policy. And then discusses the impact of the sub loan crisis on China's various economic levels, especially China's export led economic growth in the form, so that foreign business in the economic crisis suffered heavy attack. Therefore, Chinese authorities introduced a series of enterprise policy support and the eve of the tax cuts of efforts, the foreign trade enterprises to a large number of opened was slow. Although China and South Korea in the face of the financial crisis are the pay close attention to monetary policy and the expansion of financial income policy means, but due to the economic traits between the two countries and the economic differences, on the way to deal with and many of the differences. Korea adopted with the United States and Japan stop large-scale loss period business way to guard against the risk of foreign exchange owing to lack of foreign exchange reserves. Meanwhile, the Chinese because of price control and subjected to dynamic impact is small; and China's financial comfort approach for the introduction of time compared to South Korea in terms of more long. 目录: 摘要 3-4 Abstract 4 第1章 引论 7-9 1.1 探讨背景和意义 7-8 1.2 探讨思路和措施 8 1.3 结构安排 8 1.4 创新之处 8-9 第2章 文献综述 9-20 2.1 金融危机的一般性定义及观点 9 2.2 金融危机的特点 9-10 2.3 有关金融危机的主要假说 10-13 2.4 历史上主要的金融危机事件 13-14 2.5 美国次贷危机 14-18 2.5.1 次贷危机的发生原因 14-15 2.5.2 美国的应对政策 15-18 2.6 次贷危机对全球经济的作用 18-20 第3章 次贷危机对韩国经济的作用 20-35 3.1 次贷危机对韩国住宅金融市场的作用 20-23 3.2 次贷危机对韩国实体经济的作用 23-30 3.3 韩国为应对全球金融危机采取的对策 30-34 3.3.1 韩国银行的扩张性财政政策 32 3.3.2 韩国银行的金融市场稳定政策 32-33 3.3.3 韩国的外汇市场稳定政策 33-34 3.4 其他相关方法 34 3.5 启示 34-35 第4章 次贷危机对中国经济的作用 35-48 4.1 次贷危机对中国金融资本市场的作用 35-37 4.2 次贷危机对中国股市的作用 37-38 4.3 次贷危机对中国对外投资的作用 38-39 4.4 次贷危机对中国资本流动和外国直接投资的作用 39-40 4.5 次贷危机对中国进出口贸易的作用 40-43 4.6 为克服金融危机中国政府采取的救助方法 43-44 4.6.1 中国政府的经济刺激政策 43 4.6.2 4 万亿元的投资计划 43-44 4.7 中国政府经济刺激政策的具体方法 44-47 4.7.1 出口补贴及公司扶持政策 44-45 4.7.2 投资扩大政策 45 4.7.3 消费刺激政策 45 4.7.4 资产市场稳定政策 45-46 4.7.5 其他 46-47 4.8 启示 47-48 第5章 结论及不足之处 48-50 5.1 结论 48-49 5.2 不足之处 49-50 参考文献 50-53 致谢 53-55 个人简历 55 |
