| 2008年8月1日中华国民共和国反垄断法正式实行,该法初步确立了反垄断法伤害补偿轨制。但是遗憾的是,反垄断法对于个中的伤害补偿轨制划定较为简略,这给司法的实行带来了很年夜的未便,亟待赐与更加详细的划定。韩国垄断规制法于1981年便正式实行,竞争论法机构已积聚了丰硕的经历。因此,韩国反垄断法伤害补偿轨制的理论和研究都绝对深刻。为了激起反垄断法伤害补偿诉讼等反垄断法私家履行办法,2004年韩国对垄断规制法停止了修正,废除了审决前置法式履行的轨制,同时采取了认定伤害补偿金额轨制等。韩国垄断规制法私家履行,特殊是伤害补偿轨制的实行与修正,对中国反垄断法伤害补偿轨制的详细构建和实行具有主要的自创意义。是以,可以经由过程比拟和剖析中国反垄断法与韩国垄断规制法对于伤害补偿轨制的差异,就中国若何完美反垄断法伤害补偿轨制提出相干建议。第一部门,反垄断法伤害补偿轨制的概述。该部门引见了伤害补偿轨制的概念、功效及类型,阐述了反垄断法的伤害补偿轨制与平易近法的伤害补偿轨制之间的差别与接洽。第二部门,中韩反垄断法伤害补偿轨制比较。引见了中韩两国的反垄断法伤害补偿轨制现状,同时剖析了两国的反垄断法伤害补偿轨制上存在的缺点。第三部门,韩国反垄断伤害补偿轨制详细研究,具体剖析了韩国的反垄断法伤害补偿要求轨制,进一步引见韩国反垄断法伤害补偿轨制的特点,如韩国的伤害补偿金额认定轨制和修正前的审决前置法式。第四部门,以韩为鉴,完美中国反垄断法伤害补偿轨制。该部门起首剖析了中国反垄断法伤害补偿轨制构建的需要性,并阐述了中韩两国在反垄断伤害补偿轨制间的可自创性。然后从被告原告主体资历、双倍补偿轨制,管辖法院等方面提出完美中国反垄断法伤害补偿轨制的建议。 Abstract: In August 1, 2008, "the anti monopoly law of the people's Republic of China" was officially implemented, which established the system of anti monopoly law damage compensation system. Unfortunately, however, the anti monopoly law of medium injury compensation rail system defined is simple and this to the judicial practice has brought very big inconvenience, should be given more detailed delineation of. South Korea "monopoly regulation law" in 1981 will be officially implemented, the competition law institutions have accumulated rich experience. Therefore, the theory and the research on the compensation system of the damage compensation system of the Korean anti trust law is absolutely profound. In order to stir up anti monopoly law private performance measures such as anti trust law, the Republic of Korea in 2004 stopped the amendment to the "monopoly regulation law", abolished the system of pre audit, and took the amount of damage compensation system and so on. South Korea's "monopoly regulation law" private performance, special damage compensation system implementation and correction, the Chinese anti-monopoly law system of damage compensation for the detailed construction and implementation of the main significance. With the comparison and analysis of the similarities and differences between China's "anti-monopoly law" and the Korean "monopoly regulation law" on damage compensation system, the paper puts forward relevant suggestions on how to perfect the system of compensation for damage compensation in China. The first part, the summary of the damage compensation system of anti monopoly law. This department introduced the concept, the function and the type of damage compensation system, and explained the difference and connection between the damage compensation system of anti trust law and the damage compensation system of civil law. The second sector, China and South Korea antitrust law damage compensation system comparison. Introduced the anti trust law of China and South Korea damage compensation system status quo, and analyzed the shortcomings of the two countries in the anti-monopoly law of damage compensation system. The third sector, South Korea antitrust damage compensation system in detail, the specific analysis of the South Korean anti trust law damage compensation requirements system, to further introduce the South Korea antitrust law damage compensation system characteristics, such as the amount of damage compensation in Korea and the determination of the system before the trial. The fourth sector, South Korea Weijian, perfect Chinese antitrust law damage compensation system. The Department first analyzes the needs of the establishment of China's anti trust law damage compensation system, and describes the China and South Korea in the anti monopoly damage compensation system between the. And then from the plaintiff qualification, double compensation system, the jurisdiction of the court and other aspects of the perfect Chinese anti-monopoly law damage compensation system recommendations. 目录: |
