韩国语指示词“(?)”和汉语“这/那”的对照探讨[韩语论文]

资料分类免费韩语论文 责任编辑:金一助教更新时间:2017-05-05
提示:本资料为网络收集免费论文,存在不完整性。建议下载本站其它完整的收费论文。使用可通过查重系统的论文,才是您毕业的保障。
指导作为一个广泛的说话景象,是任何说话中弗成或缺的。指导词在韩国语汉语中都有着普遍的应用。古代韩国语指导词“(?)”与古代汉语指导词“这/那”和以它们为根本型派生而成的词语是韩汉指导词的典范说话成份。在指导系统上,韩国语指导词是“(?)”的三分系统,而汉语指导词是“这/那”的二分系统。因为指导系统的分歧,在对韩汉指导词的懂得和对译进程中,易发生缪误。本文斟酌到这类成绩的存在,在先辈学者相干研究结果的基本上,以韩国语指导词“(?)”和汉语指导词“这/那”为研究对象,从指导词的指导对象和功效角度停止了阐述,并在此基本长进一步论述和剖析了它们的个性和差别和提醒了两者的对应。本文在第二章重点考核了“(?)”和“这/那”的指导对象,提醒了韩汉指导词在指导人物,事物,时光,场合,事宜/话题和虚指时的特色。起首,从表示情势下去看,“这/那”零丁运用可以或许指导人物,事物,时光,场合。这类情形下,含有“这/那”的句子常常是断定句,指导对象就是句子的主语或许主题。“(?)”和“这/那”零丁运用可以或许指导事宜/话题。“(?),这/那”适用表达虚指。“这/那/名词”的构造中,这/那和名词中央可以添加数词或量词。而“(?)”没有这类用法。其次,指导人物时,“这/那”可以类指,不单单指导特定的人物,而是指导一类人;指导人物时,“这/那”可以直接用于人称代词后,针对“这/那/名词(短语)”和人称代词究竟是同位关系照样所属关系这一点,作了进一步剖析。别的,“这/那”可以和人名一路运用,这时候,“这/那”有着激烈的定冠词化偏向。指导场合时,“(?)”和“这/那”都可以直接用于固著名词前;“这/那/名词(短语)”的构造还可以直接用于固著名词后,对后面的固著名词起强调感化。第三章重点考核了韩国语指导词“(?)”汉语指导词“这/那”的指导功效和话语标志功效,提醒了“(?)”和“这/那”在功效方面的个性和差别。本文经由过程对韩国长篇小说寻觅母亲中、韩文本中指导词“这/那”和“(?)”的运用情形统计得出:汉语的指导词“这/那”共涌现了774次,个中‘这’涌现了497次,占64。2%;“那”涌现了277次,占35。8%;“这”和“那”的频率比例约为1。79:1;韩语的指导词“(?)”共涌现了979次,个中“(?)”是625次,占63。8%;“(?)”是295次,占30。1%;“(?)”是59次,占6。1%;“(?)”和“(?)”的频率比例为2。12:1。这也就是说,表达指导功效时,汉语的指导词“这”的运用频率最高,韩语论文,而韩国语的指导词‘(?)’的运用频率最高。另外,本文经由过程对寻觅母亲韩文文本中指导词“(?)”译为中文文本的指导词“这/那”的运用情形统计得出:“(?)”(99。3%)根本上与“这”对应;“(?)”与“这/那”对应的比率分离为47。8%,52。2%,;“(?)”与“这/那”对应的比率分离为30。0%,70。0%,韩语毕业论文,从而考核了韩汉指导词之间的对应关系。

Abstract:

Guide as a wide picture speak any language, is indispensable. Guide words all have widely used in Korean and chinese. The ancient Korean word "(guidance? ") and ancient Chinese guide words" this / that "and their fundamental type derived words is a model of Chinese and Korean words speak composition guidance. In the guidance system, guiding the Korean word "(? Three) "system, and guide the Chinese word is" two points system this / that ". Because of the guidance system differences, in the guidance of the Korean and Chinese words and understand of translation process, prone to mistake. In this paper, considering the results of the relevant research results in existence, advanced scholars basically, to guide the Korean word "(? "And Chinese guide words" this / that "as the research object, from the angle of the guide words of guidance to the target and the effect to carry on the elaboration. And on the basis of further discussion and analysis of their individuality and the difference and remind the both of the corresponding. This paper examines in the second chapter "(? ) "and" this / that "the guiding object, remind Han guide words in guiding characters, things, time, occasion, matters / topics and the features of virtual means. First of all, from the situation to see said, "this / that" separate applications may guide people, things, time, occasion. This kind of situation, with "this / that" the sentence is often indicative sentence, direct object is the subject of the sentence or theme. "(? ) "and" this / that "separate applications may guide issues / topics. "(? This / that), "for the expression of virtual means. The structure of this / that / noun ", and this / that the central noun can add numerals and quantifiers. "(? "There is no such usage). Secondly, guiding people. "This / that" can be to not only guide the specific character, but to lead a class of people, guiding people. "This / that can be directly used for personal pronouns, according to" zhe / Na / noun (phrase) "and personal pronouns is actually colocated ties still belongs to the relationship between this point, further analysis. The other, "this / that" can be a way of application and the names of people, at this time, "this / that" has a definite intense bias. Guide the occasion, "(? ) "and" this / that "can be directly used for fixing the noun;" this / that / noun (phrase) "structure can be directly used fixed term, on the back of the fixed term emphasis on probation. The third chapter focuses on the assessment of the Korean word "(guidance? The Chinese word "guidance") this / that "guiding effect and function of discourse markers, remind" (? ) "and" this / that "in terms of efficacy and personality differences. In this paper, through the process of Korean novels "text for mother" in Korea in the instruction word "this / that" and "(? "The statistics application): Chinese instruction word" this / that "the emergence of 774 times, the" it "appeared 497 times, accounting for 64. 2%; "that" the emergence of 277 times, accounting for 35. 8%; "this" and "that" the frequency ratio is about 1. 79:1; the guidance of Korean word "(? A total of 979 times) "has emerged, the" (? ") is 625 times, accounting for 63. 8%; "(? ") is 295 times, accounting for 30. 1%; "(? ") is 59 times, accounting for 6. 1%; "(? ) "and" (? The frequency ratio of 2). 12:1. That is to say, the expression and guiding effect, Chinese instruction word "this" application frequency was the highest, and the guide word in Korean language "? The application of the highest frequency). In addition, this article through the process of "seeking mother" in the word "(Korean text guide? The application of statistical translation) "for the Chinese text guide word" this / that ":" (? "(99). 3%) and "the fundamental" corresponding "; (? ) "and" this / that corresponds to the rate of separation was 47. 8%, 52. 2%, "; (? ) "and" this / that corresponds to the rate of separation was 30. 0%, 70. 0%, to examine the relationship between Korean and Chinese instruction word.

目录:

免费论文题目: