| 该论文重要以认知说话学的方位隐喻实际为基本,经由过程比较剖析中韩空间隐喻的各类表达措施,目标是发明两国国民在思想措施上的差异点。论文从“数目、状况、时光、规模、社会关系”五个方面比拟中韩空间隐喻的各类表达措施,经由过程比拟笔者发明在这两种说话的认知形式内,有许多堆叠和类似的部门。并进一步说明了个中的缘由,即中韩两国国民历久生涯在统一文明圈以内,构成的配合的文明习气和认知形式在说话的运用中,施展了潜伏的感化。同时,罗列了“上((?))、下((?)(?))、前((?))、后((?))”隐喻映照的对称与纰谬称的各类表达措施,并试图找出构成这类景象的缘由地点。接上去,将中韩空间隐喻表达措施的比较成果同外语进修相联合,论述了在辞汇进修中运用各类隐喻表达措施来扩展辞汇量的办法。同时,经由过程剖析隐喻纰谬称景象激发的各类毛病,来摸索在辞汇进修中削减相似毛病的办法。 Abstract: This paper is based on the cognitive theory of the direction of the metaphor of the basic metaphor, through the process of comparative analysis of the various types of expression of Sino South Korean space metaphor, the goal is to invent the similarities and differences between the two countries in the ideological and. Papers from the five aspects of "number, condition, time, scale, social relations" compare spatial metaphor in China and South Korea all expression method. Through comparing the invention in the two talk form of cognition, there are many stacking and similar departments. And further explained the whys and wherefores, namely China and South Korea national long-term career within the circle of unified civilization, formed with civilized habits and cognitive form in the application of language, cast a potential influence. At the same time, a list of the "((?)), ((?) (?)), ((?)), after ((?)" metaphorical mappings in symmetric and PI paradox says of all kinds of expression method, and try to find out this phenomenon the reason. Then, the comparative results of the expression methods of spatial metaphor in China and South Korea are combined with foreign language learning. This paper discusses the ways to expand vocabulary by using various kinds of metaphorical expressions in vocabulary learning. At the same time, through the analysis of PI perverted metaphor spectacle excited all kinds of problems to explore in vocabulary study cuts similar wrong way. 目录: 摘要 6-7 Abstract 7 目录 8-10 正文 10-79 参考文献 79-81 |
