| 疑问词的干预效应一向是说话学家争辩颇多的研究话题。Beck (2006)提出干预效应的逻辑移位实际，以为干预效应的发生是因为某个成份阻隔了原位疑问词的逻辑移位。自此以后，很多学者试图从句法、语义、语用等多方面说明该景象的发生。年夜多半研究(Beck1996, Tomioka2007)都集中在德语、日语和韩语上。本文试图研究汉语问句中的干预效应成绩：（1）Beck(2006)提出的干预词类在汉语中能否会形成干预效应？（2）是甚么形成汉语特别问句中的干预效应？（3）除特别疑问句，干预效应还存在于哪些问句中？为何干预效应能被撤消/弱化？Beck (2006)提出德语中存在一类干预词，包含量假名词、核心标志词、量化副词和否认词。基于蔡维天（1999）对疑问词的分类：副词性疑问词和名词性疑问词，我们将对此类干预词能否阻隔疑问词的解读停止检测。除特别疑问句，选择疑问句和正反问句也将被研究能否存在干预效应。从年夜量的说话现实中，我们发明：（1）Beck (2006)提出的干预词在汉语中也会激发干预效应。量假名词、量化副词和否认词只在副词性疑问词前激发干预效应，激发力较弱；当由核心标志词标志的核心短语位于副词性疑问词、名词性疑问词前时，核心标志词都邑激发干预效应，韩语论文题目，称为强干预效应。（2）量假名词不克不及话题化招致弱干预效应的发生。副词性疑问词因生成于疑问标句词的地位，不克不及被算子束缚，故量化副词、核心敏感算子位于其前均会发生干预效应。核心敏感算子阻隔疑问标句词和原位疑问词间的分歧操作的树立,从而发生强干预效应。另外，核心标志词、量化副词和否认词虽都为核心敏感算子，但因为核心标志词为语义敏感算子，韩语论文网站，量化副词和否认词为语用敏感算子，他们在激发干预效应时表示分歧。（3）干预效应不只存在于特别疑问句中，干预词在选择疑问句与正反问句中也会激发干预效应。特别问句中发生干预效应的缘由异样能说明选择疑问句与正反问句中的干预效应。同时注解三类问句是存在个性的。干预效应能被撤消是因为句子信息构造的转变。汉语问句干预效应的研究能赞助我们进一步加深对问句的懂得，也重新的角度辨别了核心敏感词的类似与分歧的地方。 Abstract: The intervention effect of the question word has always been a topic of debate. Beck (2006) put forward the logic of the effect of the intervention effect of the actual, that the effect of intervention because of the occurrence of a component of the logical shift of the in situ. Since then, many scholars have tried to explain the occurrence of this phenomenon in the following aspects: syntax, semantics, pragmatics and so on. Most of the studies (Beck1996, Tomioka2007) are concentrated in German, Japanese and korean. This paper attempts to research Chinese question in the intervention effect results: (1) Beck (2006) proposed the intervention of parts of speech in Chinese will form the intervention effect? (2) what is the formation of intervention effect of Chinese special questions? (3) in addition to the special interrogative sentence, intervention effect also exists in the question of what? Why the intervention effect can be undone / weakened? Beck (2006) proposed that there is a class of interference words in German, including the quantity of false nouns, the core symbols, the quantitative adverbs and the negative words. Based on Cai Weitian (1999) on the classification of interrogative words: Adverbs of interrogative words and noun phrases, we will be able to block the question of such intervention in the interpretation of the question of doubt. In addition to the special question sentence, the choice of question and the question will be asked to be able to study the existence of the intervention effect. From a large number of speaking reality, we have found that: (1) Beck (2006) proposed intervention in the Chinese language will also stimulate the intervention effect. Amount false noun, adverb of quantification and deny the word only in adverbs of interrogative words before excitation intervention effect, excitation force is weak; when by the core mark sign word key phrases in adverbs of interrogative words, nouns of interrogative dawdled, core marker word rhyme excitation effects of intervention, called strong intervention effect. (2) the amount of false nouns can not be subject to the occurrence of weak intervention effect. Adverbs of interrogative word due to the formation of a question mark the status of the word, can not be bound by the operator, so the quantitative adverbs, the core of the sensitive operator is located in the former will be the intervention effect. To establish the core sensitive operator standard operation word barrier question differences between interrogative words and in situ, resulting in strong interference effect. In addition, core sign words, adverb of quantification and deny the word although all core sensitive operator, but because the core mark word semantic sensitive operator, adverb of quantification and deny word for pragmatic sensitive operator, they in the excitation of the intervention effect said differences. (3) the intervention effect not only exists in the special interrogative sentence, but also can stimulate the intervention effect in the selection of the interrogative and the positive rhetorical question. The intervention effect especially in questions that can cause the same effect choice questions and A-not-A questions in intervention. At the same time there are three types of questions annotated personality. The intervention effect can be undone because of the change of the structure of the sentence information. Chinese question intervention effect research can sponsor us to further deepen the question understanding, also a new perspective to identify the core sensitive words of similar and different place. 目录: |
