| 本文对20世纪初古代主义诗人卞之琳和郑芝溶停止比拟研究。从两个方面停止体系的阐述一是从两位诗人的生温和诗歌创作配景动身,商量古代主义在中韩两国的流传,二是对两位诗人的诗歌创作停止比拟研究。第一章引见了在中韩两国文学界中这两位诗人的研究静态,研究的办法和目标。第二章重要从中韩两国的汗青文明配景动身,商量古代主义诗潮成长的概略,并从中考核中韩古代主义诗人卞之琳和郑芝溶对古代主义的接收和融会,以此剖析出分歧点。古代主义在中韩两国的流传中有着雷同点,即流传的序言和配景类似;分歧点是流传的措施分歧。而卞之琳和郑芝溶对古代主义的接收和融会却又有着分歧的选择卞之琳偏向于意味主义,而郑芝溶更偏向于意象主义。第三章是本篇论文的主体部门,从卞之琳和郑芝溶的详细的古代主义诗歌特点动身,用平行研究的办法对诗歌本体的主题、所表示的各自的和配合的艺术特色停止比拟研究。1、以家乡为主题作为一个末节停止比拟,两位诗人其时的汗青配景及其类似,中韩两都城遭到外来平易近族的侵犯。两位诗人在这一主题上有着差别,卞之琳出现出回归认识,而郑芝溶的思乡诗表现了流落认识,两位诗人虽都阅历了家的损失却以分歧情势的诗歌表示出来。2、两位诗人深受西方思惟的作用都具有传统的、古典的的偏向,在诗中不自发的吐露出古典的情感。在东瀛精力这类文明偏向下,写出带有古典情感的古代诗。但二者又有分歧,在各自的平易近族精力的引领下,两公民族本来文明渗入渗出下,写出了别具平易近族风味的诗歌著作,表现了西方精力的文学不雅。3、主知诗的比拟。两位古代主义诗人,在其时的文明配景下,从浪漫主义诗歌中走出来,摒弃了情感的肆意众多,而请求知的控制,在这里用沉着的,有时趋近于残暴的冷淡的表示措施。哲感性诗是“知性”诗弗成或缺的一部门,两位诗人在诗中都表示出一种知性的思辩,给人以想象的空间,惹人思虑。从这类“知性\"的思虑中,又引出了另外一个成绩——宗教诗,两位诗人由于有分歧的宗教不雅念,对人生又有着分歧的懂得。 Abstract: In this paper, the early twentieth Century, the ancient poet Bian Zhilin and Zheng Zhirong compared to the study. From the two aspects of the system from the two aspects of the creation of the poet's poetry creation with the king, to discuss the spread of ancient doctrine in China and South Korea, the two is the two poet's poetry creation comparative study. The first chapter introduces the two poets in the literary world of the study of the static, research methods and objectives. In the second chapter, the important starting from the historical and cultural background of China and South Korea, briefly discuss ancient poetry development and from assessment of the doctrine of ancient China and Korea poet Bian Zhilin and Jeong of the ancient doctrine of receiving and integrating, in order to analyze the bifurcation point. Ancient doctrine in the spread of China and South Korea has the same point, that is, the introduction and background of the spread of similar; the differences between the spread of the method of differences. And Bian Zhilin and Jeong of the ancient doctrine receiving and fusion but disagreement over the choice of Bian Zhilin bias in the mean doctrine, and Jeong prefer to Imagism. The third chapter is the main part of, from Bian Zhilin and Jeong with the ancient poetry features start with parallel research method on the noumenon of the poetry theme, said the respective and combined with artistic features stop comparative study. 1, to his hometown as the theme as a distal compared. Two poets the history background and similar, the two capitals of China and South Korea by foreign residents near family of violations. Two poets in this topic has a difference, Bian Zhilin showing regression understanding, and Jeong homesickness poem showed driftage, although the experience of the two poets loss but with different forms of poetry expressed. Two, 2 poets were deeply influenced by western thoughts, which had the traditional and classical deviation, and showed the classical emotion in the poem. In Japan this energy civilization bias, write with classical emotion of ancient poems. But the two have differences, in their own national spirit of the lead, the two public culture, the infiltration of the original culture, wrote the other folk flavor of the poetry works, the performance of the western literature of the spirit of the. 3, the comparison of the main knowledge of poetry. Two ancient poet, under the cultural background, come out from the romantic poetry, get rid of the feelings of wanton numerous, and knowledge of the control, in here with a calm, sometimes tend to be close to the brutal cold representation method. Zhe poetic sensibility is "intellectual" Frost's poetry or lack of a department, the two poets in the poem expressed a kind of intellectual speculation, to imagine the space, to provoke people's thinking. This kind of "intellectual " considers introduces also a result of religious poetry, the two poets due to the differences of religious ideas, of life and know the differences from the. 目录: |
